<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>因果与证据 on AI 实战派 · 从技术到赚钱</title><link>https://guijiagi.com/tags/%E5%9B%A0%E6%9E%9C%E4%B8%8E%E8%AF%81%E6%8D%AE/</link><description>Recent content in 因果与证据 on AI 实战派 · 从技术到赚钱</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-cn</language><copyright>本站内容采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 国际许可协议授权</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:36:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://guijiagi.com/tags/%E5%9B%A0%E6%9E%9C%E4%B8%8E%E8%AF%81%E6%8D%AE/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>纽康姆悖论：为什么两个看似严密的决策规则给出相反答案？</title><link>https://guijiagi.com/posts/2026-10-19-06-newcomb-problem-causal-evidential-decision/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:36:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://guijiagi.com/posts/2026-10-19-06-newcomb-problem-causal-evidential-decision/</guid><description>诺齐克1969年提出纽康姆问题，全知预测者面前拿一盒还是两盒的抉择让因果决策论与证据决策论正面冲突，本文拆解两条规则的分歧点并对照AI对齐中的策略选择。</description></item></channel></rss>