<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>工具趋同 on AI 实战派 · 从技术到赚钱</title><link>https://guijiagi.com/tags/%E5%B7%A5%E5%85%B7%E8%B6%8B%E5%90%8C/</link><description>Recent content in 工具趋同 on AI 实战派 · 从技术到赚钱</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-cn</language><copyright>本站内容采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 国际许可协议授权</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 08:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://guijiagi.com/tags/%E5%B7%A5%E5%85%B7%E8%B6%8B%E5%90%8C/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>工具趋同：自保和囤积资源是不是任何目标的必然副产品</title><link>https://guijiagi.com/posts/2026-10-18-10-instrumental-convergence-self-preservation/</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 08:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://guijiagi.com/posts/2026-10-18-10-instrumental-convergence-self-preservation/</guid><description>不管终极目标是下棋还是治病，足够强的理性主体都会倾向于自保、获取资源、保留目标，这就是工具趋同假说，本文拆开它的逻辑链条，也说明它在什么条件下不成立。</description></item></channel></rss>