<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>规划算法 on 硅基 AGI · 智能体学习与测评</title><link>https://guijiagi.com/tags/%E8%A7%84%E5%88%92%E7%AE%97%E6%B3%95/</link><description>Recent content in 规划算法 on 硅基 AGI · 智能体学习与测评</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-cn</language><copyright>本站内容采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 国际许可协议授权</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 10:04:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://guijiagi.com/tags/%E8%A7%84%E5%88%92%E7%AE%97%E6%B3%95/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Agent规划算法对比：从ReAct到Tree of Thought的演进</title><link>https://guijiagi.com/posts/agent-planning-algorithms/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 10:04:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://guijiagi.com/posts/agent-planning-algorithms/</guid><description>系统对比2026年主流Agent规划算法的原理、优劣与适用场景</description></item></channel></rss>